Science meets Spirituality in Consciousness
Thanks to Dean Radin for the link to this recent talk by Bernard Haisch on quantum physics and consciousness. Parts of it are more technical, but not excessively so. The talk is a video – about 30 min. I’d not heard about the Leggett experiment because it’s so relatively recent.
Previous post: Science and Fundamentalism
Next post: A New Worldview?
Wes Hopper
We are at a very interesting tipping point in history, one that humanity has not seen for 300 or so years. That point is a substantial shift in world view from one of solely deterministic mechanical processes that create an external reality independent of ourselves, to a world view in which we realize that we are creative beings living in a participatory universe.
This tipping point has arisen because advances in science over the last 100 years, and especially recently, have made it impossible for any open minded investigator to ignore the incompleteness of the materialist model that has dominated science since Copernicus.
Monistic Idealism is designed to explore the intersection of hard science, consciousness studies and spirituality by discussing new research, publications and commentary on these issues. As in any emerging discipline there are more questions than answers, but it is encouraging that there are more and more very smart people addressing them.
I'm not a research scientist myself, I'm an electronics engineer with a deep interest in these ideas, and an active skepticism about the wild leaps taken by many New Age writers who like to attach "quantum" to everything to make it sound scientific. There is plenty of real science to be excited about without going off the deep end. Your comments are encouraged.
Here is a PDF of a paper I presented in October, 2009 at a conference on Science and Religion. I maintain that the unifying factor between those two areas is consciousness, and that there are numerous science problems that cannot be solved without somehow incorporating consciousness as a causal element.
The Emerging Importance of Consciousness in Physics
Please note that just because it was a Science and Religion conference doesn't mean that I think that materialist, deterministic science, and literalistic ancient religion can agree. I'm an optimist, not a magician. The conference attracted the open minded from both camps.
{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }
New ways of interpreting scientific descriptions are made questioning the accepted paradigm among scientists which views randomness as the exclusive structuring principle in nature. It is a widely held view in science that formation of all features of the universe including life could have only come about through repeated, random trials and errors. In “Science and Consciousness” by Robert Tabor diverse lines of scientific evidence are presented to advance the argument that various features of the cosmos including life forms and humans had not developed through a series of innumerable random accidents, but rather must have been shaped during billions of years of evolution by a natural cosmic matrix exerting an influence to form preferred structures. The writing style follows the advice of Occam’s Razor which results in a briefer reading illustrating concepts and a global view clearly without the use of excessive specialist’s jargon.
Thanks, Robert. There’s certainly a lot of people thinking that way these days. If consciousness is the foundation of the universe instead of matter, then one would expect that the universe would be biased toward evolving conscious life. And that’s what it seems that we see.